A comment to evalatuion of the three Swedish Centres of Gender Excellence
GEXcel news
The Swedish Research Council’s investment in gender research
October 26 | 0 comments
International Conference: Gender Paradoxes in Academic and Scientific Organisation(s) – Change, Excellence and Interventions
September 07 | 0 comments
20-21 October 2011 at Örebro University, Forum House, Bio.
GEXcel evaluated
September 15 | 0 comments
Accommodation
September 09 | 0 comments
Conference call: Gender Paradoxes of Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s)
June 17 | 0 comments
CALL FOR PAPERS AND PARTICIPATION
GEXcel Theme 11-12, Gender Paradoxes of Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), invites scholars, at all career stages, to apply for a workshop conference in October 20-21, 2011 at Örebro University, Sweden.
Conference launching GEXcel Theme 11-12: Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s)
April 28 | 0 comments
Launching GEXcel Theme 11-12: GEXcel Conference Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), at Örebro University, FORUM house, Bio, May 16, 2011 at 10-17. Participation is free but participants need to register before May 9 by email to Mia Fogel, mia.fogel@oru.se. Inquiries: Liisa Husu, liisa.husu@oru.se.
Fellows for Theme 11-12 selected
April 13 | 0 comments
Visiting Fellows for GEXcel Theme 11-12, Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), have now been selected.
Subscription options
(What's this?)Barriteau, Eudine, Professor
By Stine Adrian on 28 Aug | 0 comments
Eudine Barriteau is Professor at The Centre for Gender and Development Studies, University of the West Indies, Barbados.
GEXCEL PROJECT (Theme 1: Gender, Sexuality and Global Change)
Coming, Coming, Coming Home: Applying Anna Jónasdóttir’s Theory of Love Power to Theorising Sexuality and Power in Caribbean Gender Relations
My paper seeks to apply Anna Jónasdóttir’s construction of “love power” to developing a theory of sexuality and power in the contemporary Commonwealth Caribbean, using Barbados as a case study. I engage in a triple play on the meanings of the word “coming” and anchor these meanings to black feminist theorising of the concept of “home” (Barriteau 2006: 21-22; Carby 1997: 47; Smith 1983: 64-72).
I am specifically interested in the complications romantic loving pose for Caribbean women, particularly in continuing attempts to subordinate women. I want to track how these complications become extrapolated into wider systemic inequalities, even as these are simultaneously reflected back onto the individual relationships and their representations of gendered hierarchies of power and inequalities.
I intend to foreground my analysis in the centrality of Caribbean women’s lives, as they navigate the intersections of the public and the private, production and reproduction. My challenge is to work backwards and forwards from the dynamics of that basic union (played out in private, intimate spaces such as the home), to contemporary developments in Caribbean political economy.
In everyday, Anglophone Caribbean culture, the word “coming” has an excitement and anticipation that I hope to convey in creating new theoretical insights about power and pleasure in women’s lives. While coming is used to refer to the eve of the orgasmic climax in sexual intercourse, in my analysis I want to capture the exhilaration, tension and anticipation of coming to reveal another layer of the complexities of asymmetric gender relations in the Caribbean.
I intend to use Jónasdóttir’s theorisation of “love power” to carve a new understanding of sexuality in the Caribbean. This new understanding should not only recognise its historically fluid and contested features, but seeks to explore desire, sensuality, pleasure and power in the rethinking of the discourse on sexuality in the region. Specifically I want to extend Jónasdóttir’s theorisation of “love power” to Caribbean women’s realities.
Barbados is interesting because it ranks fairly high on the UN indicators for developing countries for the HDI, the GDI and GEM. Also Barbadian women have a fairly high standard of education, and to a lesser extent economic autonomy which they strive for. In their personal lives, their sexual relations, the majority become disempowered in a way that “extracted” power is collectivized and used against them. I agree with Jónasdóttir that marriage, relationships or unions, are the link between the private and the public so I want to explore or raise some questions around what the state and civil society reinforces, institutionalizes around the conjugal union that reinforces the gradual weakening of women's love power so it ends up being something that is more or less absent from their lives.




