A comment to evalatuion of the three Swedish Centres of Gender Excellence
GEXcel news
The Swedish Research Council’s investment in gender research
October 26 | 0 comments
International Conference: Gender Paradoxes in Academic and Scientific Organisation(s) – Change, Excellence and Interventions
September 07 | 0 comments
20-21 October 2011 at Örebro University, Forum House, Bio.
GEXcel evaluated
September 15 | 0 comments
Accommodation
September 09 | 0 comments
Conference call: Gender Paradoxes of Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s)
June 17 | 0 comments
CALL FOR PAPERS AND PARTICIPATION
GEXcel Theme 11-12, Gender Paradoxes of Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), invites scholars, at all career stages, to apply for a workshop conference in October 20-21, 2011 at Örebro University, Sweden.
Conference launching GEXcel Theme 11-12: Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s)
April 28 | 0 comments
Launching GEXcel Theme 11-12: GEXcel Conference Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), at Örebro University, FORUM house, Bio, May 16, 2011 at 10-17. Participation is free but participants need to register before May 9 by email to Mia Fogel, mia.fogel@oru.se. Inquiries: Liisa Husu, liisa.husu@oru.se.
Fellows for Theme 11-12 selected
April 13 | 0 comments
Visiting Fellows for GEXcel Theme 11-12, Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s), have now been selected.
Subscription options
(What's this?)Jackson, Stevi, Professor
By Stine Adrian on 28 Aug | 0 comments
Stevi Jackson is Professor and Director of Centre for Women's Studies at University of York, UK.
GEXCEL PROJECT
Materialist Feminism, the Pragmatist Self and Global Late Modernity
For some time I have been arguing that a materialist feminist approach to gender, sexuality and heterosexuality has to take account not only of structural inequalities, but also everyday practices, meaning and self/subjectivity. In this paper I will focus on the self, developing the argument that the pragmatist thought of G. H. Mead might provide a way forward.
This tradition has had little influence among feminists, despite the historical association between pragmatism and first wave feminism in the USA. Here I argue that Mead’s conception of the self as process and his emphasis on its sociality, temporality and reflexivity might be fruitful for feminist analysis.
Reflexive self-hood is associated in recent theory with late-modern, individualised projects of the self (e.g. Giddens). This over-emphasis on individualisation has been contested by a number of feminists, particularly in relation to its alleged impact on intimate relationships (e.g. Jamieson, Smart). A return to Mead’s insistence on the sociality of the self offers us critical purchase on these debates and potential insights into constructions of gendered and sexual self-hood in late modernity, linking the self to social practice and the actualities of everyday life.
In focusing attention on the social conditions of and for reflexivity it might also help in critiquing the universalising ethnocentrism of theories of late modernity. Western societies no longer have a monopoly on modernity – the different modernities that have emerged in East Asia, for example, call into question western assumptions about the “essential” characteristics of the modern self. Drawing on scholarship from and about East Asia I will suggest that locating the reflexive self in social context enables us to consider constructions of self beyond western society and western conceptions of modernity, while also subjecting western assumptions to critical scrutiny.




